Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: ___Kaila Ober_______________________________
Paper author’s name: ___Gabby Peguero____________________________
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
_X_that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment:
Needs a little more support and explanation in the beginning. How did you come up with your idea for your paper? Make sure to include both documents from your old and new document that we used in the 2syn paper.
[opening & introduction]
__that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
I think that the introduction was very well written and grabs the attention of the reader.[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
Yes, it is well set up and clear.
[use of sources]
_X_where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
_X_that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment:
Could be built up a little more in the paper but this is a good start.
[conclusion]
_no_that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
No conclusion.
[works cited and in-text citations]
_X_that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:Yes, so far this paper contains them, however, keep this up through the entire paper and make sure to paraphrase when necessary.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
I think there are grammatical errors here and there but over-all it is not terrible and could just be looked over again carefully to spot errors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: _____Kaila Ober_____________________________
Paper author’s name: ____Westin Fisher___________________________
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
__that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
_X_Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment:
I think that the paper needs more to it, to get the point that is being researched across. It’s a bit confusing to the reader the way that it is written. There also are no citations used throughout the paper, that should be there.
[opening & introduction]
__that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
I think that the paper needs more to it, to get the point that is being researched across. It’s a bit confusing to the reader the way that it is written. There also are no citations used throughout the paper, that should be there.
[opening & introduction]
__that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
I believe that the beginning of the paper does a decent job at introducing the topic, however, I would come up with a stronger thesis and make the first paragraph stand out a little more then it does now. I also am not very sure of the forecast.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
I believe that the beginning of the paper does a decent job at introducing the topic, however, I would come up with a stronger thesis and make the first paragraph stand out a little more then it does now. I also am not very sure of the forecast.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
The thesis was not very clear.
[use of sources]
__where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
Sources were not used throughout the paper, and if they were used they were not properly cited.
[paragraph construction]
__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
The thesis was not very clear.
[use of sources]
__where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
Sources were not used throughout the paper, and if they were used they were not properly cited.
[paragraph construction]
__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment:I think it is on its way to becoming a good paper but it needs more information to back itself up.
[conclusion]
__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
There is a conclusion, but once again, if the paper was backed up better I believe that this would make for a over-all better flowing paper.
There is a conclusion, but once again, if the paper was backed up better I believe that this would make for a over-all better flowing paper.
[works cited and in-text citations]
__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:
There is not a works cited page, nor citations throughout the paper.
There is not a works cited page, nor citations throughout the paper.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
did not see many grammatical or punctuation errors, but it should be re-read to see what things could be spruced up.
